<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell&#8217;s users vote &#8211; for XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketsentinel.com/blog/2007/04/dells-users-vote-for-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketsentinel.com/blog/2007/04/dells-users-vote-for-xp/</link>
	<description>Understanding social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:29:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Form Function Emotion &#187; Chinwag PR Unspun Event Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.marketsentinel.com/blog/2007/04/dells-users-vote-for-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Form Function Emotion &#187; Chinwag PR Unspun Event Conversations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketsentinel.com/blog/2007/04/dells-users-vote-for-xp#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Manipulative? For sure. Good for consumers? For sure too. Since Dell opened up to consumers after the Dell Hell and batteries debacle Market Sentinel describes that Dell users are voting for XP to be an option on new machines, alongside Vista. Dell have actioned this, this conversation has been resolved so they get an XP option. Would this have happened without this conversation? Like hell it would. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Manipulative? For sure. Good for consumers? For sure too. Since Dell opened up to consumers after the Dell Hell and batteries debacle Market Sentinel describes that Dell users are voting for XP to be an option on new machines, alongside Vista. Dell have actioned this, this conversation has been resolved so they get an XP option. Would this have happened without this conversation? Like hell it would. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
